Charles Allen v. J. Cardenas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202120-55788California336 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN, Nos. 20-55788 20-55789 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 3:20-cv-00788-JAH-RBM v. 3:19-cv-01610-JAH-RBB

J. CARDENAS, Correctional Officer; et al.,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California John A. Houston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Charles Edward Allen appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations

of the First and Eighth Amendments arising from alleged retaliation by a

correctional officer. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.