Corkery

Corkery v. Superior Court CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2021A159463California3,379 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jackson, J.

Filed 8/26/21 Corkery v. Superior Court CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

PATRICK CORKERY,

Plaintiff and Appellant, v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE A159463

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO,

Defendant and Respondent; (City & County of San Francisco STEVE GORDON, as Director, etc., Super. Ct. No. CPF-19-516688)

Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

This is an appeal from final judgment after the trial court denied the petition for a writ of administrative mandamus (petition) filed by plaintiff Patrick Corkery against real party in interest Jean Shiomoto, in her capacity as Director of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).1 Corkery sought by writ to have the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.