People v. Gonzales CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 2021B309181California1,451 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/27/21 P. v. Gonzales CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B309181 (Super. Ct. No. YA049823) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County)

v.

PEDRO PAGAN GONZALES,

Defendant and Appellant.

Pedro Pagan Gonzales appeals his resentencing following the trial court’s denial of his motion to strike three prior serious felony strike convictions pursuant to Penal Code section 1385 and People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497.1 We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 2001, the Los Angeles County District Attorney charged Gonzales with two counts of residential burglary, possession of a

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.