United States v. James Moon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 202120-10382California499 words

Opinion

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AUG 27 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10382

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:13-cr-00244-DKW-1 District of Hawaii, v. Honolulu

JAMES MOON, ORDER

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Judges Canby and Friedland vote to grant James Moon’s petition for panel

rehearing (Docket Entry No. 20), and Judge VanDyke votes to deny the petition.

The petition for rehearing is granted. The memorandum disposition filed on May

24, 2021, and appearing at 848 Fed. App’x. 347 (9th Cir. 2021), is withdrawn. A

replacement memorandum disposition is being filed concurrently with this order.

Because the petition for rehearing is granted, the suggestion for rehearing en

banc is moot.

Any further petition for rehearing is due 14 days from the date of this order.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2021

MOLLY…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.