Erik Mishiyev v. Alphabet, Inc.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIK MISHIYEV, No. 20-15657

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-05422-WHA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ALPHABET, INC.; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Erik Mishiyev appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his diversity action alleging state law claims. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Parents for Privacy v. Barr, 949

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mishiyev’s request for oral argument, set forth…