Wolstoncroft

Wolstoncroft v. County of Yolo

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 2021C091399California7,710 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Filed 8/30/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

BONNIE WOLSTONCROFT et al., C091399

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. CVPT-18- 1854) v.

COUNTY OF YOLO,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, Peter M. Williams, Judge. Affirmed.

Benink & Slavens and Eric J. Benink for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Philip J. Pogledich, County Counsel, and Eric May, Senior Deputy County Counsel; Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, Michael G. Colantuono and John Lorenzo Jones II for Defendant and Respondent.

1 This reverse validation action was brought by Bonnie Wolstoncroft, William C. Unkel, and Michael Wilkes (collectively petitioners) against the County of Yolo (County) 1 to challenge the County’s plan to continue water service to 95 residences within the North Davis Meadows County Service Area (County Service Area) by replacing two aging groundwater wells with the City of Davis’s (City) water supply. Under this plan, North Davis Meadows residents would pay substantially higher water rates to pay for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.