United States v. Carlos Mejia-Quintanilla

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 202117-15899California824 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 30 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-15899

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:16-cv-03591-CRB 3:11-cr-00293-CRB-2 v.

CARLOS MEJIA-QUINTANILLA, AKA MEMORANDUM*

Wilfredo Oliva-Castro, AKA Sleepy,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 2, 2021 Submission Vacated February 3, 2021 Resubmitted August 26, 2012 San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and IKUTA and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Mejia-Quintanilla appeals the district court’s denial of his amended

motion to vacate his conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2555. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 2253, 2255(d), and we vacate Mejia-

Quintanilla’s conviction and sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(j)(1).

In pleading…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.