Westwood Montserrat v. AGK Sierra de Montserrat CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 2021C088569California3,642 words

Opinion

Opinion

Renner, J.

I. BACKGROUND

This appeal is the latest installment in a decade-long battle over Sierra de Montserrat, a planned residential community in Loomis, California. (Westwood Montserrat, Ltd. v. AGK Sierra de Montserrat, L.P., supra, C080395.) The story begins, for our purposes, with Westwood Montserrat’s demand for arbitration against AGK Sierra de Montserrat, L.P., Sierra de Montserrat Owners Association, and Robert C. and Jennielyn B. Kincade (together, the Kincades). (Ibid.) The arbitrator found Sierra de Montserrat Owners Association and the Kincades to be prevailing parties for purposes of an attorney fees provision in the declaration of covenants, conditions, restrictions, and

Westwood Montserrat is not a party to this appeal. For clarity, we refer to Deborah by her first name. Undesignated statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.

2 easements for the planned residential community, and ordered Westwood Montserrat to pay their attorney fees and costs.4 (Ibid.) The trial court confirmed the arbitration award and entered judgments for Sierra de Montserrat Owners Association and the Kincades in the amounts of $176,539 and $124,764, respectively. (Ibid.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.