Vincent

Vincent v. Dept. of the Cal. Highway Patrol CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2021B302026California4,199 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tangeman, J.

Filed 8/31/21 Vincent v. Dept. of the Cal. Highway Patrol CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

STANLEY VINCENT, 2d Civil No. B302026 (Super. Ct. No. 16CV05599) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Santa Barbara County)

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY

PATROL,

Defendant and Appellant.

Stanley Vincent filed this lawsuit against the State of California (State), claiming that the Department of the California Highway Patrol (CHP) violated the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) and Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) when it terminated his employment. After Vincent prevailed at trial, the State filed motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and a new trial. On appeal from the trial court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.