Tannen Soojian v. Joe Lizarraga
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 202119-15833California627 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 31 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TANNEN SOOJIAN, No. 19-15833
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:16-cv-00254-AWI-SAB v.
JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted July 6, 2021 San Francisco, California
Before: GRABER and LEE, Circuit Judges, and VRATIL, ** District Judge.
Petitioner Tannen Soojian appeals the district court’s denial of his federal
habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner argues that, by admitting
evidence of his statements to police, the state trial court violated his Fifth
Amendment rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). On this issue,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge for the District of…