Ironshore Specialty Ins. Co. v. Everest Indemnity Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 202120-55860California1,800 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 31 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE No. 20-55860 COMPANY, Individually and as Assignee of H&R Construction Surfacing Inc., D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01652-AB-GJS Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

EVEREST INDEMNITY INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 11, 2021 Seattle, Washington

Before: EBEL,** BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Ironshore Specialty Insurance Co. (“Ironshore”) appeals the district court’s

order dismissing its claims again Everest Indemnity Insurance Co. (“Everest”). We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.