United States v. Matthew Lane

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 202119-30255California588 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 1 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-30255

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00028-RMP-1 v.

MATTHEW LEE LANE, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 30, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Matthew Lee Lane appeals his jury conviction for possession and distribution

of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A) and (a)(5)(B). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review for plain error because

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Lane did not object before the district court. Rosales-Mireles v. United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.