Rick Martin v. Sundial Marine Tug & Barge Wrk

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 202120-70147California803 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 2 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICK J. MARTIN, No. 20-70147

Petitioner, BRB No. 19-0009

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SUNDIAL MARINE TUG AND BARGE

WORKS, INCORPORATED; et al.,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board

Argued and Submitted June 7, 2021 Portland, Oregon

Before: WARDLAW and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON,** District Judge.

Rick Martin petitions for review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board

(“BRB”) affirming a decision of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) denying

medical benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. “Act”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 901–950. We have jurisdiction under 33 U.S.C. § 921(c) and

deny the petition.

1. An employer is responsible for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.