Paris Holloway v. Bartman Horn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 202118-56612California1,316 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 2 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PARIS HOLLOWAY, No. 18-56612

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-03867-CAS-JC v.

BARTMAN HORN; CITY OF MEMORANDUM*

PASADENA,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 1, 2020 Pasadena, California

Before: SILER,** BERZON, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Paris Holloway brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that

defendants Bartman Horn and Pasadena are liable for the use of excessive force

against him. Horn and Pasadena appeal the denial of their motion for summary

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. judgment on qualified immunity. Taking the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.