Young

Young v. Robins

Good Law
848 F.2d 199
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 198836-3_7California716 words

Opinion

Opinion

848 F.2d 199 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Morna E. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clayton I. ROBINS, W. Neal Writer, Annette Moorehouse, Linda Preciado, Defendants-Appellees. and Samuel Gordon, David Null, Chris Clark, James, Gainey, et al. Defendants. No. 87-5773. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1988. * Decided May 24, 1988. Before BARNES, KILKENNY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Morna E. Young (Young) appeals an order dismissing her civil rights complaint against the California Workers' Compensation Board (Board). Young contends the court erred because she was not suing on the merits of her undecided compensation claims. She claims that the Board denied her due process by taking more than three years in the processing of her claims. This kind of bureaucratic bungling, if established, may give rise to a variety of state law remedies, but is not a per se violation of the fourteenth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.