Raleigh Hairston v. Todd Shipyards Corporation Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Inc., Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs

Good Law
849 F.2d 1194·1988 WL 59363·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7968
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 198886-7572California949 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

Raleigh Hairston appeals a decision of the Benefits Review Board (“the Board”). The Board reversed a ruling of an administrative law judge (“AU”) that Hairston was entitled to receive permanent total disability benefits. The AU found that Hair-ston’s injury prevented him from returning to his former work and that Todd Shipyards had failed to meet its burden of demonstrating the availability of suitable alternate work. We agree with the AU; therefore, we reverse the Board’s decision and remand for reinstatement of the AU’s finding of permanent disability.

BACKGROUND

Hairston suffered a back injury, sustained while he was employed as a rigger for Todd Shipyards. He brought a claim for benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 901 , et seq. The AU determined that Hairston’s injury prevented him from continuing longshore work. Although Hair-ston had received post-injury vocational training in apartment-motel management, Todd Shipyards did not attempt to show the availability of this or any other work to meet its burden of demonstrating that suitable alternate work was available to Hair-ston. Instead, the company relied entirely on the fact that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.