Building Materials and Construction Teamsters Local No. 216, Plaintiff v. Granite Rock Company, a Corporation

Good Law
851 F.2d 1190·1988 WL 70160·128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3060·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9289
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 198887-1959California3,684 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

Granite Rock Company (Granite Rock) appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Building Materials and Construction Teamsters Local No. 216 (union). The district court’s order requires the parties to arbitrate the question whether Granite Rock violated an implied covenant in the multi-union, multi- employer bargaining agreement (agreement) to which it is a party. Granite Rock challenges the district court’s determination of arbitrability on three grounds: (1) the union’s grievance is not arbitrable because the union failed to demonstrate that its interpretation of the agreement was plausible; (2) the union’s claim was decided adversely to the union in proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board (Board) and is therefore barred by principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel; and (3) the implied covenant, if it exists, is unenforceable because it violates section 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. § 158 (e), and public policy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I

Granite Rock operates various businesses in Northern California, including a concrete manufacturing plant in San Jose,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.