Bordeaux

Bordeaux v. State of Cal. Dept. of Child Support Services CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 2021D076736California4,497 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Adelaide Bordeaux filed a petition for writ of administrative mandamus against respondents, Department of Child Support Services (the Department), and its director, David Kilgore. In the operative second amended petition, Bordeaux sought review of the Department’s final decision denying her complaint against real party in interest and respondent, San Diego County Department of Child Support Services (the County), pertaining to the County’s pursuit of child support payments on behalf of one

of Bordeaux’s children, Q.B.1 The trial court entered an order denying Bordeaux’s petition, and subsequently entered a judgment in favor of respondents. Bordeaux, appearing in propria persona, appeals from the trial court’s judgment. We affirm.

II.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Bordeaux gave birth to Q.B. in 1993 in Maryland. Q.B.’s birth certificate lists John Bordeaux (John) as his father. In April 2003, in San Diego Superior Court, case No. 0730695025665 (“665 Case”), the County

sought to obtain child support on behalf of Bordeaux from John for Q.B.

Neither the petition, nor the operative second amended petition, is in the record. We base our description on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.