United States v. Martin Nino

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 202120-10397California310 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 7 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10397

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:16-cr-01937-JAS-BGM-1 v. 4:16-cr-01937-JAS-BGM

MARTIN ANTHONY NINO,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James Alan Soto, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 2, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and CARDONE,*** District Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Martin Nino (Nino) appeals from a November 6, 2020,

interlocutory order in which the district court committed him to the custody of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kathleen Cardone, United States District Judge for the Western District of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.