United States v. Jarvis Thomas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 202119-10426California1,042 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 7 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-10426

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:17-cr-00296-DAD-BAM-2 v.

JARVIS THOMAS, AKA Jar, AKA MEMORANDUM* JarMice,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 31, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and CARDONE,*** District Judge.

Jarvis Thomas appeals his criminal convictions for conspiracy to distribute

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kathleen Cardone, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. and possess with the intent to distribute, and possession with the intent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.