United States v. Galvin Gibson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 202119-56249California789 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 7 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-56249

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:16-cv-07435-TJH 2:09-cr-00783-TJH-3 v.

GALVIN GIBSON, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Terry J. Hatter, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 2, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, BENNETT, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Galvin Gibson appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 motion. He contends that the district court erred in denying his claims under

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959),

as well as his ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC) claims as they relate to a six-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.