Rgy
Rgy v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 202120-71729California2,477 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 7 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RGY, No. 20-71729
Petitioner, Agency No. A043-369-951
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted July 7, 2021 Portland, Oregon
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge PAEZ
RGY petitions for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals
(BIA) dismissing his appeal from a denial of his applications for withholding of
removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The facts are
known to the parties, so we repeat them only as necessary.
I
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that RGY failed to show
that if he were removed to Mexico, he likely would be tortured within the meaning
of the…