Rgy

Rgy v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 202120-71729California2,477 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 7 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RGY, No. 20-71729

Petitioner, Agency No. A043-369-951

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted July 7, 2021 Portland, Oregon

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge PAEZ

RGY petitions for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA) dismissing his appeal from a denial of his applications for withholding of

removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The facts are

known to the parties, so we repeat them only as necessary.

I

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that RGY failed to show

that if he were removed to Mexico, he likely would be tortured within the meaning

of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.