Raju Dahlstrom v. United States

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 7 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAJU A T DAHLSTROM, No. 20-35012

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-01874-RSL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

ANNE M. CRAIL,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 1, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Raju Dahlstrom appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). favor of the United States on his claim arising under the Federal Tort Claims Act

(“FTCA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

grant of summary judgment, Sandoval v. County of Sonoma, 912…