Gene Sigal v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 202118-56085California1,953 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 7 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

GENE SIGAL; L. S., a minor, by and No. 18-56085 through her Guardian Ad Litem Gene Sigal; S. S., a minor, by and through his D.C. No. 2:17-cv-04851-RGK-AGR Guardian Ad Litem Gene Sigal,

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; LILIA

MERIN; TASHA BEARD; DORIS

LEMIEUX; PRISCILLA ASHBURN;

ANGELA LEE; and CATHY

WEINGART;

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted July 7, 2020 Pasadena, California

Before: BERZON and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and KATZMANN,** Judge.

Gene Sigal and his minor children appeal the district court’s dismissal of

four of their six § 1983 claims against the County of Los Angeles and several of its

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Gary S. Katzmann, Judge for the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.