People v. Santanabollas CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Javier Santanabollas was convicted by a jury of one count of felony
evading a police officer (Veh. Code, § 2800.2, count 1); one count of possession of
burglary tools (Pen. Code, § 466, count 4); and one count of petty theft (Pen. Code,
§ 488, count 3), arising out of an October 19, 2019, incident involving a vehicle pursuit
by police. In a bifurcated proceeding, defendant also admitted he suffered a prior strike
offense. (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (c), (e)(1), 1170.12, subd. (c)(1).) Defendant was
sentenced to an aggregate term of six years in state prison, representing the aggravated
term of three years, doubled for his prior strike offense in count 1 and concurrent terms of
180 days on counts 3 and 4.
On appeal, defendant argues the judgment should be reversed because (1) the trial
court erred in permitting the prosecution to present evidence of two prior vehicle pursuits
involving defendant pursuant to Evidence Code1 section 1101, subdivision (b), and
(2) the trial court erred in permitting the prosecution to present evidence of the
convictions arising out of these prior incidents for the purpose of impeachment. We find
no error in the…