People v. Tatum CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 2021C093211California966 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mauro, J.

Filed 9/9/21 P. v. Tatum CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C093211

v. (Super. Ct. No. 20FE001703)

SAMSON EUGENE TATUM,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Samson Eugene Tatum asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found a minor sentencing error, which we will modify the judgment to correct. We will affirm the judgment as modified. I The prosecution charged defendant with a single count of unlawful possession of a firearm. (Pen. Code, § 29800, subd. (a)(1).)1 The prosecution also alleged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.