United States v. Jamie Matsuba

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 202120-50256California798 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 9 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 20-50256 20-50258 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:16-cr-00538-RGK-4 v. 2:16-cr-00538-RGK-

JAMIE MATSUBA and TAKAHARO MEMORANDUM

THOMAS MATSUBA,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 7, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,*** District Judge.

Following a seven-day jury trial, Jamie Matsuba and Takaharo Thomas

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. 1 Matsuba were convicted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.