Jerry Brown v. Raymond Madden

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 202120-16903California564 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

SEP 9 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JERRY BROWN, No. 20-16903

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-02691-PJH

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 3, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Jerry Brown, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of

his pro se habeas corpus 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. He challenges a conviction on

multiple counts of sex-related offenses, contending that the state trial court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). questioning of Brown and his wife violated Brown’s due process right to a fair trial

under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.