Jane Roe v. Skillz, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 202120-17221California763 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 9 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JANE ROE, No. 20-17221
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00888-JAD-BNW and
ALYSSA BALL; JOHN PRIGNANO, MEMORANDUM*
Plaintiffs,
v.
SKILLZ, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 9, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: SILER,*** CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. Appellant Jane Roe raised claims against Skillz Inc., arising out of her use of