Issam Knickerbocker v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 202120-15624California674 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
SEP 9 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ISSAM ELIE KNICKERBOCKER, Nos. 20-15624 20-16086 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:16-cv-01811-DAD-JLT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
NICOLE GRUVER; BRIAN DREW, MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 3, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Issam Knickerbocker appeals the district court’s grant of summary
judgment to defendants United States of America, and Rangers Nicole Gruver and
Brian Drew on Knickerbocker’s excessive force and unlawful seizure claims under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and his state law…