People v. Alexander CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
In 2004, defendant and appellant Steven Eugene Alexander was charged by a
single-count information with possession of a stolen vehicle pursuant to Penal Code1
section 496d, subdivision (a). The information also alleged that he had served one prior
prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) and had one prior strike conviction (§§ 1170.12,
subds. (a)-(d), 667, subds. (b)-(i)). Defendant entered a plea agreement and pled guilty in
exchange for a two-year term in state prison and the dismissal of the other allegations. In
2017, he filed a resentencing petition under section 1170.18 (Prop. 47, as approved by
voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 4, 2014).) The People filed an opposition asserting defendant
had to prove the stolen vehicle was worth less than $950. A trial court held a hearing and
found defendant was not eligible for resentencing and denied the petition without
prejudice.
On February 17, 2021, defendant filed a motion to correct/modify and/or remand
the sentence. The motion was denied by written order finding that, in his plea agreement,
defendant agreed to pay actual restitution, there was a victim restitution hearing where
the court heard argument by the…