Kimberly Archie v. Pop Warner Little Scholars Inc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 10, 202120-55081California1,112 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 10 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIMBERLY ARCHIE, as survivors of No. 20-55081 decedent Paul Bright Jr.; JO CORNELL, an individual, and as survivor of decedent Tyler D.C. No. Cornell, 2:16-cv-06603-PSG-PLA

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

POP WARNER LITTLE SCHOLARS,

INC., a nonprofit corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 30, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, BENNETT, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Appellants Kimberly Archie and Jo Cornell filed suit under the Class Action

Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) against Pop Warner Little Scholars, Inc. (“Pop

Warner”). The operative complaint asserted various state law claims based on

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. allegations that Pop Warner failed to provide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.