L.A. County Metropolitan Transportation Auth. v. Superior Court

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 2021B311725California696 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baker, J.

Filed 9/13/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

LOS ANGELES COUNTY B311725

METROPOLITAN

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. Petitioner, BH013505)

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS

ANGELES COUNTY,

Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ronald S. Coen, Judge. Petition granted. Kendall Brill & Kelly, Robert E. Dugdale and Laura W. Brill, for Petitioner. Leah C. Gershon for Respondent. In this writ proceeding instituted by the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), we principally consider whether a magistrate’s decision to authorize a search warrant constitutes a decision on a “contested fact issue[ ] relating to the merits” under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 (section 170.6). MTA’s petition arises from a special proceeding it filed on March 8, 2021, to quash a search warrant. The warrant was authorized by Judge Ronald Coen on February 26, 2021. Consistent with Penal Code section 1538.5, subdivision (a), the superior court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.