People v. Osbourn CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 2021A161126California2,443 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 9/13/21 P. v. Osbourn CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A161126

v. DAVID OSBOURN, (Mendocino County Super. Ct. No. Defendant and Appellant.

SCUK-CRCR-202033913)

Defendant David Osbourn appeals from a judgment entered after he pled no contest to one count of possession of child pornography. Defendant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief asking this court for an independent review of the record under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Defendant was informed of his right to file supplemental briefing and has not filed such a brief. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and independently reviewed the record, and we find no errors or other issues requiring further briefing.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.