Samuel Arrington v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 14, 202116-56755California1,196 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 14 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL CALHOUN ARRINGTON, No. 16-56755 individually, and through his next best friend, AURELIA CLEO BATTLE, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-04698-GW-AGR Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF LOS ANGELES; DANIEL

PENNINGTON; RUSS GRAYBILL;

JOHNATHAN JORDAN; CHRISTIAN

ARRUE; ERIC OLIVE; DOES, 1-10,

inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 13, 2019 Pasadena, California

Before: BERZON, R. NELSON, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Samuel Arrington appeals the district court’s dismissal of his false

arrest and false imprisonment claim against the City of Los Angeles and five Los

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Angeles Police Department officers (collectively, “defendants”).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.