In re Z.R. CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 2021B300696California2,357 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tangeman, J.

Filed 9/14/21 In re Z.R. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

Guardianship of Z.R., a Minor. 2d Civil No. B300696 (Super. Ct. No. BP168313) (Los Angeles County)

EARL DUFFIE, SR., et al.,

Petitioners and Respondents,

v.

C.R.,

Objector and Appellant.

C.R. appeals from the probate court’s order granting permanent guardianship of her son, Z.R., to his paternal grandparents, Earl and Verlene Duffie.1 C.R. contends the order must be vacated because: (1) the court failed to issue a written statement of decision, and (2) substantial evidence does not support the order. We affirm.

1 We use the Duffies’ first names for clarity.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

C.R. and her son, Z.R. C.R. is a survivor of sex trafficking. She was abducted in 2010,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.