People v. Dearman CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 2021C091422California2,133 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duarte, J.

Filed 9/15/21 P. v. Dearman CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Colusa) ----

THE PEOPLE, C091422

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CR603212)

v.

RYAN ALAN DEARMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

On the eve of trial, defendant Ryan Alan Dearman sought to substitute his public defender with private counsel and continue the trial date. The trial court rejected defendant’s request and the case proceeded to trial, where the jury found defendant guilty of dissuading a witness (Pen. Code, § 136.1, subd. (b)(2); count I) and misdemeanor domestic battery (id., § 243, subd. (e)(1); count III). On appeal, defendant argues the trial court abused its discretion and violated his constitutional rights to due…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.