Ster

Ster v. Ster CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 2021C087729California5,322 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/16/21 Ster v. Ster CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

JAMES FRANK STER III, C087729

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2017- 00215909-PR-TR-FRC) v.

JOHN STER, as Successor Trustee, etc.,

Defendant and Appellant;

KAREN REEVES,

Appellant.

Defendant John Ster (“John”) and plaintiff James Frank Ster III (“James”), along with their adult siblings Judy Bauer (“Judy”) and Janice Glaser (“Janice”), are beneficiaries of their deceased father’s trust, the James Frank Ster, Jr. Revocable Living Trust (the “Trust”). On appeal, John and his wife Karen Reeves (“Karen”) contend the trial court erred in removing John as the acting trustee, freezing the assets of the Trust,

1 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.