Ross

Ross v. Fox CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 2021B298873MCalifornia26,227 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 9/16/21 Ross v. Fox CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

JERRY ROSS et al., B298873

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC576879) v.

ORDER MODIFYING

ALAN FOX et al., OPINION AND DENYING

PETITION FOR

Defendants and REHEARING Appellants.

NO CHANGE IN THE

APPELLATE JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

The above-entitled opinion filed on August 25, 2021 is modified as follows:

On page 34, after the first paragraph, add the following paragraph: The Fox defendants contend on appeal that “no reasonable jury could reject the financial elder abuse claim on the ground that Ross was not an elder.” But the Fox defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.