United States v. Roberto Rojas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202121-30051California265 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30051

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:19-cr-00134-DCN-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROBERTO MANUEL ROJAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Roberto Manuel Rojas appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction, 262-month sentence, and $1,000.00 fine for

distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C § 841(a) and (b)(1)(A).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rojas’s counsel has filed a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.