United States v. Jeff Trask
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202120-30105California337 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30105
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 6:17-cr-00007-SEH-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JEFF ALLEN TRASK,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Jeff Allen Trask appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion
for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court denied Trask’s motion because it agreed with the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). government that Trask had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before
filing the motion. See 18…