United States v. Jeff Trask

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202120-30105California337 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30105

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 6:17-cr-00007-SEH-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JEFF ALLEN TRASK,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Jeff Allen Trask appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion

for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court denied Trask’s motion because it agreed with the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). government that Trask had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before

filing the motion. See 18…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.