United States v. Andrew Gomez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202121-30008California254 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30008

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:20-cr-00006-BMM-

v.

ANDREW MICHAEL GOMEZ, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian Morris, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Andrew Michael Gomez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 120-month mandatory minimum sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) and 846. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.