United States v. Andrew Gomez
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202121-30008California254 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30008
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:20-cr-00006-BMM-
v.
ANDREW MICHAEL GOMEZ, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian Morris, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Andrew Michael Gomez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 120-month mandatory minimum sentence imposed following his
guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute
methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) and 846. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we…