Kimetra Brice v. 7hbf No.2, Ltd.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202119-17477California438 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KIMETRA BRICE; et al., No. 19-17477
Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-01481-WHO
v.
MEMORANDUM∗
SEQUOIA CAPITAL OPERATIONS, LLC;
et al.,
Defendants,
and
7HBF NO. 2, LTD.; et al.,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 16, 2020 San Francisco, California
Before: W. FLETCHER, FORREST**, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge W. FLETCHER
∗ This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** Formerly known as Danielle J. Hunsaker. Defendants-appellants 7HBF NO. 2, LTD et al. appeal from the district
court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. 1 We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(A), (C), and we reverse and remand with instructions to stay the
case and compel arbitration. We resolve this case for the…