Kimetra Brice v. 7hbf No.2, Ltd.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202119-17477California438 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIMETRA BRICE; et al., No. 19-17477

Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-01481-WHO

v.

MEMORANDUM∗

SEQUOIA CAPITAL OPERATIONS, LLC;

et al.,

Defendants,

and

7HBF NO. 2, LTD.; et al.,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 16, 2020 San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, FORREST**, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge W. FLETCHER

∗ This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** Formerly known as Danielle J. Hunsaker. Defendants-appellants 7HBF NO. 2, LTD et al. appeal from the district

court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. 1 We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(A), (C), and we reverse and remand with instructions to stay the

case and compel arbitration. We resolve this case for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.