In Re: BRENT WEBSTER
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202120-35905California277 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: BRENT EVAN WEBSTER, No. 20-35905 ______________________________ D.C. No. 3:20-mc-00903
BRENT EVAN WEBSTER,
Petitioner-Appellant. MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Brent Evan Webster appeals pro se from the district court’s order imposing a
prefiling review restriction on Webster’s filings. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
In his opening brief, Webster fails to address how the district court erred by
imposing the prefiling review restriction on frivolous or repetitive filings. As a
result, Webster has waived his challenge to the district court’s order. See Smith v.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for…