In Re: BRENT WEBSTER

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202120-35905California277 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: BRENT EVAN WEBSTER, No. 20-35905 ______________________________ D.C. No. 3:20-mc-00903

BRENT EVAN WEBSTER,

Petitioner-Appellant. MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Brent Evan Webster appeals pro se from the district court’s order imposing a

prefiling review restriction on Webster’s filings. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Webster fails to address how the district court erred by

imposing the prefiling review restriction on frivolous or repetitive filings. As a

result, Webster has waived his challenge to the district court’s order. See Smith v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.