Brent Webster v. Alex Trail

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202120-35799California299 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRENT EVAN WEBSTER, No. 20-35799

Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00878-MO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ALEX TRAIL; CONNIE TRAIL,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Brent Evan Webster appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying any relief sought

in his “objections to no evidence hearings on April 30, 2020,” in his adversary

proceeding against Alex Trail and Connie Trail. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Webster fails to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.