People v. Nichols CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 2021C092439California2,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

Renner, J.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant began dating E.S., the mother of six-year-old Jane Doe, and moved into the home with E.S., Jane Doe, and her brother. The children called defendant, “Daddy Gary.” Several months after defendant moved in, Jane Doe reported to E.S. that

1 defendant wanted her to put her mouth on his penis. E.S. told her that was bad and not to say such things. Jane Doe responded, “ ‘I couldn’t keep it a secret anymore, but daddy asked me to.’ ” While Jane Doe’s mother and brother were sleeping, defendant lured her to put her mouth on his penis by telling her it would give her milk. Jane Doe said she put her mouth on defendant’s penis as he instructed. E.S. confronted defendant; he denied the allegation and begged E.S. not to report it to the police. He then fled. Jane Doe reported multiple similar incidents of defendant touching or attempting to touch her inappropriately. The district attorney filed an amended complaint charging defendant in count 1 with oral copulation or sexual penetration with a child under the age of 10 (Pen. Code,1 § 288.7, subd. (b)), and in count 2 with committing a lewd or lascivious act on a child under the age of 14 (§ 288, subd. (a)). Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.