United States v. Vaudencia Hamilton

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202121-30046California332 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30046

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00086-DCN-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

VAUDENCIA CEBALLOS HAMILTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Vaudencia Ceballos Hamilton appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying her motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

As an initial matter, in a decision issued after the district court denied

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Hamilton’s motion, we held that “§ 3582(c)(1)(A)’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.