United States v. Vaudencia Hamilton
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202121-30046California332 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30046
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00086-DCN-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
VAUDENCIA CEBALLOS HAMILTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Vaudencia Ceballos Hamilton appeals pro se from the district court’s order
denying her motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
As an initial matter, in a decision issued after the district court denied
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Hamilton’s motion, we held that “§ 3582(c)(1)(A)’s…