United States v. Howard Cotterman

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202120-10371California615 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 20-10371 21-10040 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:07-cr-01207-RCC-CRP-

HOWARD WESLEY COTTERMAN,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Howard Wesley Cotterman appeals pro se

from the district court’s orders denying his motion for compassionate release under

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), and motion for reconsideration. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Although Cotterman was notified by the court that his reply brief was untimely, it has been filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.