United States v. Gloudina Robbertse
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202120-30264California449 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
SEP 17 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30264
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00281-DCN-
v.
GLOUDINA MARIA ROBBERTSE, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Gloudina Maria Robbertse appeals from the district court’s order denying
her motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.
Robbertse contends that the district court erred under United States v. Aruda,
993 F.3d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 2021), by relying on U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 to evaluate
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…