United States v. Eugene McNeely

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202119-10371California442 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-10371

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:17-cr-00204-JD-

v.

EUGENE LATRELL MCNEELY, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Donato, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Eugene Latrell McNeely appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 168-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction

for transportation of a minor for prostitution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). McNeely contends that the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.